CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 5 |
| Goals | 1 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Points | 3 |
| Ice time per game | 16:53 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 64.7% |
| Goals above expected | +0.6 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Manson is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.71Assists /60
1.42ixG /60
0.27Shots /60
4.26
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
64.7%CF% (5v5)
53.5%Relative xGF%
+13.4xGA /60 (lower is better)
2.01
Usage
TOI per game
16:53PP time share
0.0%PK time share
44.5%Quality of competition
26.1%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Josh Manson