CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic |  Travis SanheimDefence · PHI |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 1 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 24:33 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 22.7% |
| Goals above expected | +0.8 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Sanheim is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.61Assists /60
0.61ixG /60
0.13Shots /60
5.50
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
22.7%CF% (5v5)
33.7%Relative xGF%
−6.4xGA /60 (lower is better)
5.07
Usage
TOI per game
24:33PP time share
4.9%PK time share
68.9%Quality of competition
28.2%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Travis Sanheim