CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 14:47 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 44.8% |
| Goals above expected | −0.1 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Walman is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
0.15Shots /60
5.07
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
44.8%CF% (5v5)
50.5%Relative xGF%
−17.7xGA /60 (lower is better)
3.00
Usage
TOI per game
14:47PP time share
31.1%PK time share
20.0%Quality of competition
26.8%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Jake Walman