CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 5 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 18:06 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 58.1% |
| Goals above expected | −0.4 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Wotherspoon is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
0.24Shots /60
3.32
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
58.1%CF% (5v5)
60.6%Relative xGF%
−6.2xGA /60 (lower is better)
2.46
Usage
TOI per game
18:06PP time share
2.4%PK time share
40.5%Quality of competition
28.2%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Parker Wotherspoon