CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic |  Zach WerenskiDefence · CBJ |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Points | 4 |
| Ice time per game | 29:35 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 56.7% |
| Goals above expected | −0.7 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Werenski is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
2.03ixG /60
0.36Shots /60
4.56
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
56.7%CF% (5v5)
52.9%Relative xGF%
+10.4xGA /60 (lower is better)
2.24
Usage
TOI per game
29:35PP time share
74.4%PK time share
59.2%Quality of competition
27.8%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Zach Werenski