CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 6 |
| Goals | 2 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Points | 5 |
| Ice time per game | 21:06 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 60.8% |
| Goals above expected | 0.0 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Marner is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.95Assists /60
1.42ixG /60
0.94Goals above expected
0.0
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
60.8%CF% (5v5)
54.9%Relative xGF%
−2.6Penalty diff /60
0.47
Usage
TOI per game
21:06PP time share
72.4%Offensive zone starts
69.0%Quality of competition
28.3%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Mitch Marner