CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 2 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Points | 5 |
| Ice time per game | 22:24 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 65.8% |
| Goals above expected | +0.3 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Matthews is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
1.34Assists /60
2.01ixG /60
1.16Goals above expected
+0.3
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
65.8%CF% (5v5)
57.4%Relative xGF%
+18.1Penalty diff /60
0.67
Usage
TOI per game
22:24PP time share
71.5%Offensive zone starts
91.7%Quality of competition
29.9%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Auston Matthews