CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 10:16 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 45.0% |
| Goals above expected | −0.5 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Jones is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
0.67Goals above expected
−0.5
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
45.0%CF% (5v5)
50.0%Relative xGF%
−15.3Penalty diff /60
-2.92
Usage
TOI per game
10:16PP time share
4.3%Offensive zone starts
53.8%Quality of competition
27.0%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Max Jones