CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic |  Andrew PeekeDefence · UTA |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 1 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 15:48 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 55.3% |
| Goals above expected | +0.4 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Peeke is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.95Assists /60
0.95ixG /60
0.56Shots /60
4.75
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
55.3%CF% (5v5)
55.0%Relative xGF%
−3.3xGA /60 (lower is better)
2.12
Usage
TOI per game
15:48PP time share
0.0%PK time share
42.0%Quality of competition
28.4%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Andrew Peeke