Skip to content
Ice Lab
CompareUp to 4 side by side

Head to head.

Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.

Michael Carcone

The headline numbers

A dot marks the best of the group.

StatisticMichael CarconeLeft wing · UTA
Games5
Goals1
Assists1
Points2
Ice time per game12:29
xGF% (5v5)49.4%
Goals above expected−0.8

Where they rank

Percentiles among qualified forwards. Carcone is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.

Scoring

  • Goals /60

    0.96
  • Assists /60

    0.96
  • ixG /60

    1.70
  • Goals above expected

    −0.8

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)

    49.4%
  • CF% (5v5)

    53.6%
  • Relative xGF%

    −11.9
  • Penalty diff /60

    0.00

Usage

  • TOI per game

    12:29
  • PP time share

    24.9%
  • Offensive zone starts

    58.8%
  • Quality of competition

    28.2%

Against expectation

Model-based
Goals above expected

Goals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.

Michael Carcone
-1-0.50+0.5+1012345GoalsAppearance