CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 5 |
| Goals | 3 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Points | 7 |
| Ice time per game | 21:30 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 59.2% |
| Goals above expected | +2.2 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Makar is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
1.67Assists /60
2.23ixG /60
0.46Shots /60
7.26
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
59.2%CF% (5v5)
52.6%Relative xGF%
+5.3xGA /60 (lower is better)
2.18
Usage
TOI per game
21:30PP time share
73.1%PK time share
24.3%Quality of competition
28.7%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Cale Makar