CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic |  Neal PionkDefence · WPG |
|---|---|
| Games | 5 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 23:21 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 34.3% |
| Goals above expected | −0.6 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Pionk is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.51ixG /60
0.31Shots /60
4.11
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
34.3%CF% (5v5)
45.8%Relative xGF%
−14.8xGA /60 (lower is better)
3.78
Usage
TOI per game
23:21PP time share
48.8%PK time share
53.1%Quality of competition
27.7%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Neal Pionk