Skip to content
Ice Lab
CompareUp to 4 side by side

Head to head.

Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.

Sheldon Dries

The headline numbers

A dot marks the best of the group.

StatisticSheldon DriesCentre · DET
Games2
Goals0
Assists0
Points0
Ice time per game10:23
xGF% (5v5)45.8%
Goals above expected−0.4

Where they rank

Percentiles among qualified forwards. Dries is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.

Scoring

  • Goals /60

    0.00
  • Assists /60

    0.00
  • ixG /60

    1.04
  • Goals above expected

    −0.4

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)

    45.8%
  • CF% (5v5)

    47.6%
  • Relative xGF%

    −8.6
  • Penalty diff /60

    0.00

Usage

  • TOI per game

    10:23
  • PP time share

    0.0%
  • Offensive zone starts

    50.0%
  • Quality of competition

    26.5%

Against expectation

Model-based
Goals above expected

Goals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.

Sheldon Dries
-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1000.511.52GoalsAppearance