CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic |  Ty EmbersonDefence · EDM |
|---|---|
| Games | 2 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 11:16 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 38.1% |
| Goals above expected | −0.1 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Emberson is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
0.29Shots /60
0.00
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
38.1%CF% (5v5)
45.9%Relative xGF%
−20.5xGA /60 (lower is better)
3.18
Usage
TOI per game
11:16PP time share
0.0%PK time share
1.4%Quality of competition
25.4%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Ty Emberson