Skip to content
Ice Lab
CompareUp to 4 side by side

Head to head.

Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.

Barrett Hayton

The headline numbers

A dot marks the best of the group.

StatisticBarrett HaytonCentre · UTA
Games5
Goals0
Assists2
Points2
Ice time per game13:38
xGF% (5v5)68.8%
Goals above expected−1.6

Where they rank

Percentiles among qualified forwards. Hayton is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.

Scoring

  • Goals /60

    0.00
  • Assists /60

    1.76
  • ixG /60

    1.39
  • Goals above expected

    −1.6

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)

    68.8%
  • CF% (5v5)

    67.0%
  • Relative xGF%

    +14.0
  • Penalty diff /60

    -0.88

Usage

  • TOI per game

    13:38
  • PP time share

    7.5%
  • Offensive zone starts

    21.9%
  • Quality of competition

    28.5%

Against expectation

Model-based
Goals above expected

Goals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.

Barrett Hayton
-1.5-1-0.50012345GoalsAppearance