CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic |  Connor DewarCentre · PIT |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 13:41 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 67.2% |
| Goals above expected | −1.0 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Dewar is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
1.10Goals above expected
−1.0
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
67.2%CF% (5v5)
47.2%Relative xGF%
+10.8Penalty diff /60
-1.10
Usage
TOI per game
13:41PP time share
0.0%Offensive zone starts
14.8%Quality of competition
28.4%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Connor Dewar