CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 1 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 10:42 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 47.9% |
| Goals above expected | +0.5 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Caulfield is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
1.40Assists /60
1.40ixG /60
0.65Goals above expected
+0.5
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
47.9%CF% (5v5)
43.5%Relative xGF%
−2.2Penalty diff /60
0.00
Usage
TOI per game
10:42PP time share
0.7%Offensive zone starts
29.4%Quality of competition
27.4%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Judd Caulfield