Skip to content
Ice Lab
CompareUp to 4 side by side

Head to head.

Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.

Shane Pinto

The headline numbers

A dot marks the best of the group.

StatisticShane PintoCentre · OTT
Games3
Goals0
Assists2
Points2
Ice time per game18:20
xGF% (5v5)57.9%
Goals above expected−0.9

Where they rank

Percentiles among qualified forwards. Pinto is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.

Scoring

  • Goals /60

    0.00
  • Assists /60

    2.18
  • ixG /60

    0.96
  • Goals above expected

    −0.9

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)

    57.9%
  • CF% (5v5)

    52.5%
  • Relative xGF%

    +16.9
  • Penalty diff /60

    0.00

Usage

  • TOI per game

    18:20
  • PP time share

    36.6%
  • Offensive zone starts

    32.0%
  • Quality of competition

    28.2%

Against expectation

Model-based
Goals above expected

Goals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.

Shane Pinto
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2000.511.522.53GoalsAppearance