CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 3 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Points | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 18:20 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 57.9% |
| Goals above expected | −0.9 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Pinto is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
2.18ixG /60
0.96Goals above expected
−0.9
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
57.9%CF% (5v5)
52.5%Relative xGF%
+16.9Penalty diff /60
0.00
Usage
TOI per game
18:20PP time share
36.6%Offensive zone starts
32.0%Quality of competition
28.2%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Shane Pinto