CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 15:16 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 53.8% |
| Goals above expected | −0.1 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Crevier is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.98ixG /60
0.13Shots /60
3.93
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
53.8%CF% (5v5)
55.8%Relative xGF%
−9.3xGA /60 (lower is better)
2.14
Usage
TOI per game
15:16PP time share
0.0%PK time share
53.1%Quality of competition
28.1%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Louis Crevier