Skip to content
Ice Lab
CompareUp to 4 side by side

Head to head.

Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.

Matthew Knies

The headline numbers

A dot marks the best of the group.

StatisticMatthew KniesLeft wing · CBJ
Games3
Goals2
Assists2
Points4
Ice time per game18:09
xGF% (5v5)53.0%
Goals above expected+1.1

Where they rank

Percentiles among qualified forwards. Knies is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.

Scoring

  • Goals /60

    2.20
  • Assists /60

    2.20
  • ixG /60

    1.04
  • Goals above expected

    +1.1

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)

    53.0%
  • CF% (5v5)

    48.4%
  • Relative xGF%

    −1.6
  • Penalty diff /60

    3.30

Usage

  • TOI per game

    18:09
  • PP time share

    76.8%
  • Offensive zone starts

    75.0%
  • Quality of competition

    27.8%

Against expectation

Model-based
Goals above expected

Goals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.

Matthew Knies
0+0.5+1+1.500.511.522.53GoalsAppearance