CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 3 |
| Goals | 2 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Points | 4 |
| Ice time per game | 18:09 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 53.0% |
| Goals above expected | +1.1 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Knies is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
2.20Assists /60
2.20ixG /60
1.04Goals above expected
+1.1
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
53.0%CF% (5v5)
48.4%Relative xGF%
−1.6Penalty diff /60
3.30
Usage
TOI per game
18:09PP time share
76.8%Offensive zone starts
75.0%Quality of competition
27.8%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Matthew Knies