CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic |  Tyson HindsDefence · ANA |
|---|---|
| Games | 2 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 12:00 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 47.2% |
| Goals above expected | −0.2 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Hinds is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
0.39Shots /60
10.01
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
47.2%CF% (5v5)
47.5%Relative xGF%
+6.7xGA /60 (lower is better)
1.65
Usage
TOI per game
12:00PP time share
0.0%PK time share
2.0%Quality of competition
28.9%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Tyson Hinds