CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 5 |
| Goals | 2 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 3 |
| Ice time per game | 14:29 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 51.3% |
| Goals above expected | +0.6 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Wright is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
1.66Assists /60
0.83ixG /60
1.19Goals above expected
+0.6
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
51.3%CF% (5v5)
47.8%Relative xGF%
+6.7Penalty diff /60
1.66
Usage
TOI per game
14:29PP time share
38.4%Offensive zone starts
82.6%Quality of competition
26.8%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Shane Wright