Skip to content
Ice Lab
CompareUp to 4 side by side

Head to head.

Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.

Shane Wright

The headline numbers

A dot marks the best of the group.

StatisticShane WrightCentre · SEA
Games5
Goals2
Assists1
Points3
Ice time per game14:29
xGF% (5v5)51.3%
Goals above expected+0.6

Where they rank

Percentiles among qualified forwards. Wright is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.

Scoring

  • Goals /60

    1.66
  • Assists /60

    0.83
  • ixG /60

    1.19
  • Goals above expected

    +0.6

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)

    51.3%
  • CF% (5v5)

    47.8%
  • Relative xGF%

    +6.7
  • Penalty diff /60

    1.66

Usage

  • TOI per game

    14:29
  • PP time share

    38.4%
  • Offensive zone starts

    82.6%
  • Quality of competition

    26.8%

Against expectation

Model-based
Goals above expected

Goals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.

Shane Wright
-0.50+0.5+1012345GoalsAppearance