CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 2 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 9:22 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 66.8% |
| Goals above expected | −0.2 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Engstrom is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
0.51Shots /60
3.21
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
66.8%CF% (5v5)
60.0%Relative xGF%
−2.0xGA /60 (lower is better)
1.92
Usage
TOI per game
9:22PP time share
0.0%PK time share
5.0%Quality of competition
27.8%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Adam Engstrom