CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 1 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 10:24 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 65.3% |
| Goals above expected | −0.3 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Wright is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
1.48Goals above expected
−0.3
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
65.3%CF% (5v5)
50.0%Relative xGF%
+37.6Penalty diff /60
0.00
Usage
TOI per game
10:24PP time share
0.5%Offensive zone starts
0.0%Quality of competition
27.7%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Jared Wright