Skip to content
Ice Lab
CompareUp to 4 side by side

Head to head.

Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.

Nate Danielson

The headline numbers

A dot marks the best of the group.

StatisticNate DanielsonCentre · DET
Games3
Goals0
Assists1
Points1
Ice time per game8:37
xGF% (5v5)52.2%
Goals above expected−0.2

Where they rank

Percentiles among qualified forwards. Danielson is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.

Scoring

  • Goals /60

    0.00
  • Assists /60

    2.32
  • ixG /60

    0.48
  • Goals above expected

    −0.2

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)

    52.2%
  • CF% (5v5)

    58.8%
  • Relative xGF%

    −6.0
  • Penalty diff /60

    -2.32

Usage

  • TOI per game

    8:37
  • PP time share

    4.6%
  • Offensive zone starts

    42.9%
  • Quality of competition

    27.0%

Against expectation

Model-based
Goals above expected

Goals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.

Nate Danielson
-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05000.511.522.53GoalsAppearance