CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 5 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 9:09 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 47.3% |
| Goals above expected | −0.3 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Danielson is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
1.31ixG /60
0.45Goals above expected
−0.3
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
47.3%CF% (5v5)
52.1%Relative xGF%
−9.3Penalty diff /60
-1.31
Usage
TOI per game
9:09PP time share
3.5%Offensive zone starts
45.5%Quality of competition
26.7%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Nate Danielson