CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 3 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 8:37 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 52.2% |
| Goals above expected | −0.2 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Danielson is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
2.32ixG /60
0.48Goals above expected
−0.2
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
52.2%CF% (5v5)
58.8%Relative xGF%
−6.0Penalty diff /60
-2.32
Usage
TOI per game
8:37PP time share
4.6%Offensive zone starts
42.9%Quality of competition
27.0%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Nate Danielson