CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Points | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 9:51 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 21.8% |
| Goals above expected | −0.2 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Lardis is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
3.05ixG /60
0.26Goals above expected
−0.2
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
21.8%CF% (5v5)
26.9%Relative xGF%
−17.0Penalty diff /60
3.05
Usage
TOI per game
9:51PP time share
28.3%Offensive zone starts
50.0%Quality of competition
28.3%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Nick Lardis