CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 11:25 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 45.2% |
| Goals above expected | −0.1 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified defencemen. Metsa is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
1.31ixG /60
0.08Shots /60
1.31
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
45.2%CF% (5v5)
50.0%Relative xGF%
−19.0xGA /60 (lower is better)
2.50
Usage
TOI per game
11:25PP time share
0.0%PK time share
46.0%Quality of competition
27.5%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Zach Metsa