CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 3 |
| Goals | 0 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 8:16 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 28.7% |
| Goals above expected | −0.1 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Samanski is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.00Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
0.19Goals above expected
−0.1
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
28.7%CF% (5v5)
35.0%Relative xGF%
−32.5Penalty diff /60
-4.84
Usage
TOI per game
8:16PP time share
10.8%Offensive zone starts
90.0%Quality of competition
26.7%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Josh Samanski