CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 6 |
| Goals | 2 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Points | 4 |
| Ice time per game | 12:36 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 70.8% |
| Goals above expected | +0.3 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Connelly is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
1.59Assists /60
1.59ixG /60
1.31Goals above expected
+0.3
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
70.8%CF% (5v5)
63.4%Relative xGF%
+10.9Penalty diff /60
0.00
Usage
TOI per game
12:36PP time share
41.9%Offensive zone starts
78.6%Quality of competition
26.8%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Trevor Connelly