CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 4 |
| Goals | 2 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Points | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 13:50 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 39.3% |
| Goals above expected | +0.9 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Hagens is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
2.17Assists /60
0.00ixG /60
1.23Goals above expected
+0.9
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
39.3%CF% (5v5)
44.6%Relative xGF%
−17.2Penalty diff /60
-1.08
Usage
TOI per game
13:50PP time share
37.5%Offensive zone starts
55.6%Quality of competition
28.7%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
James Hagens