CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 2–1–0 |
| Points | 4 |
| Goal differential | −1 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 61.7% |
| Power play | 0.0% |
| Penalty kill | 66.7% |
| Goals saved above exp. | −3.6 |
| Points above expected | −0.4 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.667#10Goal differential
−1#21Points above expected
−0.4#22
Offence
Goals for per game
3.33#11xGF /60 (5v5)
2.95#7Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
58.80#12Power play %
0.0%#29
Defence
Goals against per game
3.67#23xGA /60 (5v5)
1.84#3Penalty kill %
66.7%#26Goals saved above expected
−3.6#26
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
61.7%#4CF% (5v5)
59.4%#4Faceoff %
50.6%#14
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Buffalo Sabres