CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 1–1–0 |
| Points | 2 |
| Goal differential | 0 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 49.5% |
| Power play | 40.0% |
| Penalty kill | 66.7% |
| Goals saved above exp. | −1.3 |
| Points above expected | +0.2 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.500#22Goal differential
0#18Points above expected
+0.2#17
Offence
Goals for per game
3.50#10xGF /60 (5v5)
1.98#26Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
45.27#28Power play %
40.0%#6
Defence
Goals against per game
3.50#22xGA /60 (5v5)
1.97#8Penalty kill %
66.7%#27Goals saved above expected
−1.3#22
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
49.5%#17CF% (5v5)
43.9%#25Faceoff %
55.9%#2
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Columbus Blue Jackets