CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 0–2–1 |
| Points | 1 |
| Goal differential | −6 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 53.7% |
| Power play | 16.7% |
| Penalty kill | 61.5% |
| Goals saved above exp. | −7.8 |
| Points above expected | −2.5 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.167#31Goal differential
−6#28Points above expected
−2.5#32
Offence
Goals for per game
3.00#19xGF /60 (5v5)
2.25#21Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
56.35#17Power play %
16.7%#21
Defence
Goals against per game
5.00#31xGA /60 (5v5)
1.96#7Penalty kill %
61.5%#31Goals saved above expected
−7.8#31
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
53.7%#13CF% (5v5)
51.2%#16Faceoff %
56.9%#1
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Los Angeles Kings