CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic |   Minnesota WildCentral Division |
|---|---|
| Record | 2–0–1 |
| Points | 5 |
| Goal differential | +4 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 46.8% |
| Power play | 36.4% |
| Penalty kill | 100.0% |
| Goals saved above exp. | +3.5 |
| Points above expected | +1.4 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.833#4Goal differential
+4#6Points above expected
+1.4#4
Offence
Goals for per game
3.00#14xGF /60 (5v5)
2.02#25Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
51.50#21Power play %
36.4%#9
Defence
Goals against per game
1.67#2xGA /60 (5v5)
2.28#15Penalty kill %
100.0%#1Goals saved above expected
+3.5#3
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
46.8%#22CF% (5v5)
50.6%#17Faceoff %
48.0%#22
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Minnesota Wild