CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 2–1–2 |
| Points | 6 |
| Goal differential | +1 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 41.2% |
| Power play | 31.6% |
| Penalty kill | 82.4% |
| Goals saved above exp. | +2.9 |
| Points above expected | +1.5 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.600#15Goal differential
+1#18Points above expected
+1.5#8
Offence
Goals for per game
2.80#19xGF /60 (5v5)
1.83#29Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
45.39#28Power play %
31.6%#4
Defence
Goals against per game
2.60#12xGA /60 (5v5)
2.59#23Penalty kill %
82.4%#14Goals saved above expected
+2.9#9
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
41.2%#28CF% (5v5)
41.3%#30Faceoff %
47.4%#24
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Nashville Predators