CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 4–1–0 |
| Points | 8 |
| Goal differential | +8 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 49.5% |
| Power play | 21.4% |
| Penalty kill | 87.5% |
| Goals saved above exp. | +5.5 |
| Points above expected | +1.2 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.800#6Goal differential
+8#3Points above expected
+1.2#5
Offence
Goals for per game
3.20#13xGF /60 (5v5)
2.47#17Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
48.21#26Power play %
21.4%#17
Defence
Goals against per game
1.60#1xGA /60 (5v5)
2.49#19Penalty kill %
87.5%#11Goals saved above expected
+5.5#1
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
49.5%#18CF% (5v5)
45.9%#22Faceoff %
52.2%#10
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
New York Rangers