CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 2–2–0 |
| Points | 4 |
| Goal differential | +4 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 48.1% |
| Power play | 25.0% |
| Penalty kill | 72.7% |
| Goals saved above exp. | +2.1 |
| Points above expected | +0.5 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.500#17Goal differential
+4#7Points above expected
+0.5#14
Offence
Goals for per game
3.75#8xGF /60 (5v5)
2.57#12Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
50.56#23Power play %
25.0%#13
Defence
Goals against per game
2.75#17xGA /60 (5v5)
2.76#23Penalty kill %
72.7%#24Goals saved above expected
+2.1#8
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
48.1%#20CF% (5v5)
42.4%#28Faceoff %
49.6%#18
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Seattle Kraken