CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 2–1–0 |
| Points | 4 |
| Goal differential | −3 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 30.7% |
| Power play | 25.0% |
| Penalty kill | 75.0% |
| Goals saved above exp. | −1.3 |
| Points above expected | +2.3 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.667#13Goal differential
−3#26Points above expected
+2.3#2
Offence
Goals for per game
3.00#16xGF /60 (5v5)
1.30#32Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
42.27#30Power play %
25.0%#12
Defence
Goals against per game
4.00#24xGA /60 (5v5)
2.92#28Penalty kill %
75.0%#19Goals saved above expected
−1.3#21
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
30.7%#31CF% (5v5)
39.8%#30Faceoff %
44.4%#30
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
San Jose Sharks