CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 2–1–0 |
| Points | 4 |
| Goal differential | +1 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 62.3% |
| Power play | 0.0% |
| Penalty kill | 85.7% |
| Goals saved above exp. | +0.8 |
| Points above expected | −0.3 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.667#14Goal differential
+1#13Points above expected
−0.3#19
Offence
Goals for per game
2.67#22xGF /60 (5v5)
3.50#2Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
67.28#3Power play %
0.0%#30
Defence
Goals against per game
2.33#6xGA /60 (5v5)
2.05#9Penalty kill %
85.7%#13Goals saved above expected
+0.8#15
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
62.3%#2CF% (5v5)
58.0%#5Faceoff %
48.2%#21
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Tampa Bay Lightning