CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 2–2–0 |
| Points | 4 |
| Goal differential | 0 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 53.0% |
| Power play | 21.4% |
| Penalty kill | 90.9% |
| Goals saved above exp. | +0.6 |
| Points above expected | −0.4 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.500#18Goal differential
0#17Points above expected
−0.4#21
Offence
Goals for per game
2.75#21xGF /60 (5v5)
2.85#9Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
58.74#13Power play %
21.4%#18
Defence
Goals against per game
2.75#18xGA /60 (5v5)
2.49#18Penalty kill %
90.9%#5Goals saved above expected
+0.6#16
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
53.0%#15CF% (5v5)
53.1%#12Faceoff %
51.1%#13
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Toronto Maple Leafs