CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic |   Utah MammothCentral Division |
|---|---|
| Record | 3–1–0 |
| Points | 6 |
| Goal differential | +9 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 58.3% |
| Power play | 61.5% |
| Penalty kill | 92.9% |
| Goals saved above exp. | +2.5 |
| Points above expected | +0.3 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.750#8Goal differential
+9#1Points above expected
+0.3#16
Offence
Goals for per game
4.25#5xGF /60 (5v5)
3.07#5Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
66.19#4Power play %
61.5%#1
Defence
Goals against per game
2.00#4xGA /60 (5v5)
2.25#14Penalty kill %
92.9%#4Goals saved above expected
+2.5#5
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
58.3%#9CF% (5v5)
56.1%#11Faceoff %
53.0%#8
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Utah Mammoth