CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Record | 1–1–0 |
| Points | 2 |
| Goal differential | +1 |
| xGF% (5v5, adj.) | 42.2% |
| Power play | 25.0% |
| Penalty kill | 88.9% |
| Goals saved above exp. | +3.2 |
| Points above expected | +1.0 |
Where they rank
Bars are percentiles among the 32 teams; the number beside each is the league rank.
Results
Points %
.500#23Goal differential
+1#15Points above expected
+1.0#9
Offence
Goals for per game
3.00#18xGF /60 (5v5)
2.22#22Shot attempts /60 (5v5)
53.79#18Power play %
25.0%#15
Defence
Goals against per game
2.50#11xGA /60 (5v5)
3.10#29Penalty kill %
88.9%#10Goals saved above expected
+3.2#4
Control
xGF% (5v5, adjusted)
42.2%#26CF% (5v5)
44.6%#23Faceoff %
46.4%#26
Against expectation
Model-basedActual goal differential minus expected-goal differential, added up game by game. Rising lines outscore their chances, through finishing, goaltending or luck.
Washington Capitals