CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 3 |
| Goals | 1 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Points | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 20:26 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 52.0% |
| Goals above expected | −0.3 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Point is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
0.98Assists /60
0.98ixG /60
1.23Goals above expected
−0.3
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
52.0%CF% (5v5)
57.1%Relative xGF%
−14.9Penalty diff /60
-0.98
Usage
TOI per game
20:26PP time share
77.6%Offensive zone starts
81.0%Quality of competition
27.9%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Brayden Point