CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 5 |
| Goals | 6 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Points | 8 |
| Ice time per game | 21:22 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 50.9% |
| Goals above expected | +2.8 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. Connor is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
3.37Assists /60
1.12ixG /60
1.81Goals above expected
+2.8
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
50.9%CF% (5v5)
50.3%Relative xGF%
+14.2Penalty diff /60
0.00
Usage
TOI per game
21:22PP time share
69.7%Offensive zone starts
70.5%Quality of competition
27.8%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Kyle Connor