Skip to content
Ice Lab
CompareUp to 4 side by side

Head to head.

Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.

Kevin Stenlund

The headline numbers

A dot marks the best of the group.

StatisticKevin StenlundCentre · UTA
Games6
Goals0
Assists1
Points1
Ice time per game13:43
xGF% (5v5)47.1%
Goals above expected−0.3

Where they rank

Percentiles among qualified forwards. Stenlund is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.

Scoring

  • Goals /60

    0.00
  • Assists /60

    0.73
  • ixG /60

    0.24
  • Goals above expected

    −0.3

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)

    47.1%
  • CF% (5v5)

    48.1%
  • Relative xGF%

    −15.7
  • Penalty diff /60

    -0.73

Usage

  • TOI per game

    13:43
  • PP time share

    0.1%
  • Offensive zone starts

    20.0%
  • Quality of competition

    28.4%

Against expectation

Model-based
Goals above expected

Goals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.

Kevin Stenlund
-0.3-0.2-0.100123456GoalsAppearance