CompareUp to 4 side by side
Head to head.
Pick players or teams to line up their seasons: the headline numbers, where they rank, and whether they scored more or less than their chances deserved.
The headline numbers
A dot marks the best of the group.
| Statistic | |
|---|---|
| Games | 5 |
| Goals | 2 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Points | 4 |
| Ice time per game | 16:06 |
| xGF% (5v5) | 57.9% |
| Goals above expected | +0.8 |
Where they rank
Percentiles among qualified forwards. McMichael is below the playing-time threshold, so treat their bars with care.
Scoring
Goals /60
1.49Assists /60
1.49ixG /60
0.87Goals above expected
+0.8
Play-driving
xGF% (5v5)
57.9%CF% (5v5)
53.8%Relative xGF%
+6.0Penalty diff /60
0.75
Usage
TOI per game
16:06PP time share
44.6%Offensive zone starts
68.4%Quality of competition
27.9%
Against expectation
Model-basedGoals minus individual expected goals, added up game by game. Rising lines finished better than the chances suggest.
Connor McMichael