Tue, Dec 15, 2009·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul
Columbus Blue Jackets 1, Minnesota Wild 2
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 66% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBJ | 03 | 19 | 010 | 122 |
| MIN | 011 | 16 | 16 | 223 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 3:41CBJRick NashAssists: Jason Chimera · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
- P2 8:08MINGuillaume LatendresseAssists: Mikko Koivu, Martin Havlat · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1
- P3 19:21MINMarek ZidlickyGWGAssists: Mikko Koivu · Slap, 0.03 xG1–2
Penalties (2)
- P2 14:35CBJJan Hejda: Hooking2 min
- P2 15:45MINMarek Zidlicky: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Vermette
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 66% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (MIN − CBJ), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).