Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 13, 2010·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Colorado Avalanche 0, Los Angeles Kings 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 61% of the time.

LAK winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL0401206022
LAK091628323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 11:19LAKBrad RichardsonGWGAssists: Rob Scuderi, Rich Clune · Tip-in, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P3 3:48LAKAnze KopitarPPAssists: Jack Johnson, Drew Doughty · Snap, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P3 7:02LAKOscar MollerAssists: Rich Clune, Jack Johnson · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:29COLCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:29LAKRich Clune: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 10:47COLBrandon Yip: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 13:15LAKRich Clune: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 2:04COLRyan Wilson: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 4:57LAKRob Scuderi: Boarding5 min
  7. P2 11:35LAKRaitis Ivanans: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 11:35COLChris Durno: Interference2 min
  9. P2 11:35COLChris Durno: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 2:40COLChris Durno: Boarding2 min · PPG
  11. P3 10:44LAKRandy Jones: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
43% to win57% to win
← COL attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Stoll
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLLAK
22Shots on goal23
2.0Expected goals1.5
48Shot attempts36
18Faceoffs won22
3Power plays4
15Penalty minutes16
25Hits26
6Blocked shots13
6Giveaways10
5Takeaways2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 1.5 xGCOL 2.0 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 8/100 · #1136 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 61% of the time.

LAK winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).