Tue, Mar 30, 2010·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville
Los Angeles Kings 2, Nashville Predators 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 60% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAK | 018 | 04 | 29 | 231 |
| NSH | 08 | 015 | 011 | 034 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P3 7:50LAKScott ParseGWGAssists: Jeff Halpern, Randy Jones · Snap, 0.16 xG1–0
- P3 17:59LAKSean O'DonnellAssists: Alex Frolov, Jarret Stoll · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–0
Penalties (5)
- P1 2:16LAKJeff Halpern: Tripping2 min
- P1 10:00NSHJordin Tootoo: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
- P2 11:07LAKJarret Stoll: Holding2 min
- P3 16:45NSHSteve Sullivan: Cross checking2 min
- P3 16:45LAKDrew Doughty: Cross checking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Stoll won the faceoff against Goc
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 60% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NSH − LAK), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).