Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 12, 2010·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit

Colorado Avalanche 5, Detroit Red Wings 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 56% of the time.

DET winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
COL19114213021538
DET1429114010428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:34DETJohan FranzenAssists: Todd Bertuzzi · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:56COLDavid JonesAssists: John-Michael Liles, Mark Olver · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:50DETPavel DatsyukPPAssists: Henrik Zetterberg, Nicklas Lidstrom · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:02DETJohan FranzenAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Todd Bertuzzi · Snap, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P2 19:11COLRyan O'ReillyAssists: David Jones · Slap, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P3 4:43COLDaniel WinnikAssists: Adam Foote · Snap, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:52DETPatrick EavesSHAssists: Darren Helm, Nicklas Lidstrom · Snap, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P3 11:24COLDavid JonesAssists: Brandon Yip, Matt Duchene · Backhand, 0.11 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. DET Pavel Datsyuk stopped
  2. 2. COL Milan Hejduk stopped
  3. 3. DET Jiri Hudler stopped
  4. 4. COL Chris Stewart stopped
  5. 5. DET Todd Bertuzzi stopped
  6. 6. COL Matt Duchene stopped
  7. 7. DET Johan Franzen stopped
  8. 8. COL David Jones stopped
  9. 9. DET Mike Modano stopped
  10. 10. COL Ryan O'Reilly stopped
  11. 11. DET Henrik Zetterberg stopped
  12. 12. COL Brandon Yip scored
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 8:59DETBrad Stuart: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 11:12COLCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 11:12DETDoug Janik: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 2:33COLBrandon Yip: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 5:54DETValtteri Filppula: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 1:43DETDaniel Cleary: Interference2 min
  7. P3 7:39DETRuslan Salei: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zetterberg won the faceoff against Stastny
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLDET
38Shots on goal28
2.4Expected goals2.1
56Shot attempts65
32Faceoffs won30
4Power plays1
7Penalty minutes13
26Hits29
26Blocked shots11
4Giveaways16
6Takeaways19

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Yip – Duchene5:14

    xG 0.25–0.12 (67%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  2. Winnik – Galiardi – O'Reilly2:48

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  3. Winnik – McLeod – Duchene3:49

    xG 0.10–0.08 (56%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Winnik – Galiardi – Duchene2:59

    xG 0.10–0.14 (41%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHannan – Liles2:12

    xG 0.10–0.02 (85%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Liles – Quincey2:21

    xG 0.17–0.11 (62%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  3. Hannan – Wilson2:36

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestHolmstrom – Datsyuk – Zetterberg14:52

    xG 0.65–0.33 (66%)attempts 21–13goals 0–0

  2. Cleary – Datsyuk – Zetterberg2:03

    xG 0.09–0.02 (82%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Bertuzzi – Filppula – Franzen12:23

    xG 0.37–0.30 (55%)attempts 12–8goals 2–1

  4. Eaves – Miller – Helm5:44

    xG 0.08–0.12 (40%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLidstrom – Stuart16:08

    xG 0.65–0.42 (61%)attempts 19–15goals 1–0

  2. Salei – Kronwall6:22

    xG 0.24–0.10 (70%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Salei – Kindl10:09

    xG 0.28–0.26 (52%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 2.1 xGCOL 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #46 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.50 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 56% of the time.

DET winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).